The Rich, Famous, and Intestate

Apr 27, 2012  /  By: Bradley B. Anderson, Estate Planning Attorney  /  Category: Estate Planning, Wills and Trusts

Most of us assume that anyone worth millions of dollars would certainly go to the trouble of creating a comprehensive estate plan, or at the very minimum a Last Will and Testament. As with many assumptions, that one would be incorrect. A surprising number of the rich and famous have died intestate, or without leaving behind a valid Will, including the following:

Sonny Bono: Best known early on as half of “Sonny and Cher”, Bono later went on to become the mayor of Palm Springs, California and a member of the U.S. House of Representatives before dying in a tragic skiing accident in 1998. Bono did not leave behind a Will. Shortly after his death, his wife and mother became embroiled in a legal battle over Bono’s estate.

Steve McNair: The NFL star was shot and killed by an alleged girlfriend at the age of 36. McNair left behind a family and a fortune, but no Will.

DJ AM: Although this name may only be familiar to those of a certain age group, the famous DJ died of a drug overdose in 2009 without having executed a Will prior to his death.

Howard Hughes: The eccentric billionaire who was worth in the neighborhood of $2.5 billion when he died in 1976 failed to leave behind a Will. Although one was produced after his death, it was later determined to be a forgery. Eventually, 22 cousins inherited Hughes’s fortune.

Pablo Picasso: The famous artist died at the age of 91 leaving behind homes, cash and artwork valued in the millions, but did not leave behind a Will. Six years later, at an estimated cost of $30 million, his estate was settled.

You may not be famous or rich, but if die intestate you leave the problems for the courts and the state to decide. It leaves children unprotected, special people in your life disappointed and causes undue financial expense on the estate.

Anderson, Dorn & Rader, Ltd is a member of the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys.

I’ve Been Named Executor of A Will — Now What?

Apr 17, 2012  /  By: Bradley B. Anderson, Estate Planning Attorney  /  Category: Wills and Trusts

In many cases, you will know if someone has nominated you as executor in their Last Will and Testament because they will have discussed the appointment with you. Sometimes, however, a person fails to discuss their plans ahead of time, resulting in a surprise telephone call letting you know that you are appointed as the an executor. If this happens, what do you do?

First, don’t panic. A nomination is just that — a nomination. You are under no legal obligation to accept the position. If you do not feel that you can serve as the executor, or do not want to serve, you may decline the nomination.

If you decide to accept the nomination, there are several basic things that will need to happen afterwards. Unless someone else has already done so, you need to petition the appropriate court to probate the decedent’s estate.

Next, you should marshall and safeguard the estate assets to the best of your ability. Eventually you will also need to thoroughly inventory and value the estate assets.

Finally, if you have not already done so, you should retain professional help. Depending on the size of the estate, you may need the assistance of an attorney as well as other professionals in order to properly administer the estate. Typically, reasonable fees associated with professional services you use in order to probate the estate are paid for out of the estate assets .  If you find yourself in ths situation, consult with an estate planning attorney as soon as possible to learn of all your fiduciary obligations.

Anderson, Dorn & Rader, Ltd is a member of the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys.

Terms of Houston’s Estate Show a Trust Was Created for Daughter

Mar 23, 2012  /  By: Bradley B. Anderson, Estate Planning Attorney  /  Category: Wills and Trusts

Once the world began to get over the shock of the death of music legend and golden girl Whitney Houston, reports began to surface that there was trouble brewing with regard to her estate. Houston was found dead in her Beverly Hills hotel room at the age of 48 and left behind only one heir — 18 year old Bobbi Kristina. While fans rushed to buy anything related to Houston, Houston’s family was already poised for a fight over her estate with Houston’s ex-husband Bobby Brown. With the news this week that Houston left behind a trust, everyone in Houston’s camp can breath a sigh of relief.

Despite unprecedented success in her professional career throughout the 90s, Houston was plagued with personal problems as a result of a battle with drug and alcohol addiction as well as a stormy relationship with Bobbi Kristina’s father, singer Bobby Brown. After finally divorcing Brown in 2007, Houston appeared to be on the road to a comeback when she was found dead last month.

While Houston’s daughter is of age to inherit directly, she allegedly battles her own issues with drugs and alcohol, making her susceptible to a claim that she is unable to handle her own finances and in need of a conservator. Houston’s family was reportedly worried that Brown would petition a court to become her conservator, effectively gaining control of Houston’s fortune. Houston, however, apparently thought ahead and created a trust for Bobbi Kristina. By creating a trust, Houston put a stop to any attempts to gain control of the money and put control of the money in the hands of someone she hand picked as trustee.

Anderson, Dorn & Rader, Ltd is a member of the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys.

Whitney Houston’s Estate Value Soaring After Death

Mar 09, 2012  /  By: Bradley B. Anderson, Estate Planning Attorney  /  Category: Estate Planning, Life Insurance, Wills and Trusts

The voice behind the famous song I Will Always Love You, was found dead of unknown causes in the bathtub of her hotel room just hours before the Grammy Awards. The untimely death of the 48-year old singer/actress comes after a decade of personal troubles including drug and alcohol addiction as well as the end of her highly publicized relationship with Bobby Brown. Just hours after her death, sales of anything “Whitney Houston” started to soar. The ultimate value of her estate has yet to be determined; however, it is clear that, as has been the case with other artists, her death may cause her popularity, and therefore her wealth, to increase substantially. The death of the once darling of both the screen and the radio reminds us all of how important it is to create an estate plan.

People often make the mistake of thinking that creating an estate plan is not necessary unless you have a substantial estate at the time. What many people don’t realize, however, is that the value of your estate can soar at any time. Unfortunately, as the untimely death of Houston reminds us, death can also strike at any time. The seed you plant today, whether it is an investment, life insurance, law suit or fledgling business, could be worth a small fortune tomorrow. Those “seeds” will become part of your estate upon your death. Even if they are not worth a substantial amount at the time of your death, they may continue to grow after your death. Deciding who will receive those assets, therefore, becomes important. The only way to ensure that your assets will be handled in the manner you intend is to create a comprehensive estate plan today.

Anderson, Dorn & Rader, Ltd is a member of the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys.

Trusts — Irrevocable Versus Revocable

Mar 02, 2012  /  By: Bradley B. Anderson, Estate Planning Attorney  /  Category: Asset Protection Planning, probate, Taxes, Wills and Trusts

A trust is often used as an estate planning tool in order to accomplish a variety of goals. At its most basic, a trust consists of a grantor (sometimes called a settlor, or trustor) who establishes the trust, a trustee who administers the trust assets, at least one beneficiary, and assets to fund the trust. Often, all three positions — grantor, trustee and beneficiary — can be held by the same person. Beyond that, trusts come in numerous forms that range in complexity; however, one simple distinction centers around whether the trust is revocable or irrevocable. Understanding some of the important features of the two options can help you decide which one is right for you.

All funded trusts, including the revocable trust, avoid probate. What this means is that the funds held in the trust are not required to pass through the often lengthy legal process that follows the death of the grantor, making the trust benefits available to the beneficiaries in a much more timely fashion. A much more important aspect of a revocable trust is that a revocable trust, as implied by the name, can be revoked, amended or modified by the grantor at any time. This feature can be very important if you feel that you may wish to change the beneficiaries or the specific terms of the trust at some future point. This flexibility makes a revocable trust an attractive option for most people.

An irrevocable trust cannot be revoked, amended or modified without court intervention in most states. Under most circumstances, the grantor may not be the trustee or the beneficiary.  All control and access is delivered to an independent trustee and a third party beneficiary.  What the grantor receives, however, for giving up the ability to control the trust is asset protection, probate avoidance, possible estate tax avoidance and potential income tax and, when the beneficiary is a charity, capital gains tax advantages.  These are highly complex strategies and must be entered into with appropriate caution.  The expertise of a qualified estate planning attorney should always be sought.

Anderson, Dorn & Rader, Ltd is a member of the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys.

How to Choose A Trustee

Feb 24, 2012  /  By: Bradley B. Anderson, Estate Planning Attorney  /  Category: probate, Wills and Trusts

When you create a trust, one of the most important decisions you must make is who to appoint to succeed you as your trustee. Although each trust is unique, there are some basic considerations that you may wish to take into account before making a decision regarding the appointment of a trustee.

  • The Purpose and Complexity of The Trust: Trusts come in numerous forms and are created for a wide variety of reasons. A trust may be rather simple, such as a trust that is created solely for the purpose of providing funds to care for a pet after the death of the maker of the trust. On the other hand, a trust may be extremely complex, such as a trust created to manage and distribute a large estate after the death of the maker. A trust with a simple purpose does not require as much from the trustee as a complex trust does.
  • Location of Trust Assets: The trustee is responsible for all trust assets for the lifetime of the trust. Where the trust assets are located is an important consideration. It is sometimes helpful if the trustee is located near the assets in order to more effectively manage the assets. With today’s electronic communications, however, this is not as great a factor.
  • Relationship of the Trustee to the Beneficiaries: Does the potential trustee have any financial interest in the trust itself or a direct relationship to the financial interest of a beneficiary? Does the potential trustee have an obvious or potential conflict of interest with any of the beneficiaries? If so, you may wish to reconsider selecting this potential trustee.
  • Financial Ability and Experience: The trustee has numerous duties to both the assets of the trust itself and the beneficiaries. Depending on the size of the trust, managing the trust assets may require a high level of financial ability and experience. Be certain the person you appoint has the experience and the ability to handle the position or to manage the experts who will take care of the technical matters.
Keep in mind that a qualified estate administration attorney can assist your successor trustee through all the issues of administration.

Anderson, Dorn & Rader, Ltd is a member of the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys.

Is A Last Will The Best Choice?

Oct 25, 2011  /  By: Bradley B. Anderson, Estate Planning Attorney  /  Category: Estate Planning, Wills and Trusts

The last will is a document that most people are familiar with and is the most common estate planning tool. In fact, many movies have romanticized the proverbial “reading” of the last will of a deceased family member. We can all imagine a family gathered in a lawyers office as the will is read, letting each person know what they received, or did not receive, from the estate.

Most people know that there are other legal instruments that can be utilized. But a lot of them are under the impression that only people of extraordinary wealth need to step outside of the tried-and-true last will as a primary vehicle of asset transfer.

In reality, people of ordinary means may want to consider alternatives to a last will when they are making plans for the future. There are a number of reasons for this, but the most compelling one is the fact that your estate must be probated if you use a last will.

The process of probate can slow things down considerably. During this interim the probate court examines the will in an effort to determine whether or not it is valid. So, at this time interested parties who may not agree with the contents of the will could step forward and present challenges. This can result in a long and drawn out legal struggle. Just think back to the case of Anna Nicole Smith. That battle was just resolved last summer some 15 years after it began.

Probate is also a source of asset erosion. There are costs that the estate will incur while it is being probated. Depending on the size of the estate, the nature of the assets contained therein, and whether or not there are any challenges costs could reach 4-8% of the total value of the estate and in some cases even more.

Most people are not going to be fully informed when they start making plans for the future. The worst way to plan is to rely on Hollywood’s representation of what an estate plan should look like. The best way to gain an understanding of how to proceed given the unique nature of your circumstances is to consult with an experienced, savvy estate planning attorney.

Anderson, Dorn & Rader, Ltd is a member of the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys.

Is Your Pet Included In Your Estate Plan?

Sep 22, 2011  /  By: Bradley B. Anderson, Estate Planning Attorney  /  Category: Estate Planning, Pet Planning, Wills and Trusts

Making sure that your assets are properly prepared for distribution to your loved ones after your passing can be an involved matter. Because there’s so much to take into consideration it is easy to look past some of the finer details. If you are a pet owner, making sure that your dog or cat is provided for after your passing may be one of these matters that gets lost in the shuffle. You may just assume that it is something that will take care of itself, or that you will outlive your pet. While it is possible that someone would simply step forward and care for the pet or that you will outlive it, it is best to make the appropriate arrangements “just in case.”

It should be mentioned that pet ownership can be very beneficial for senior citizens. Many of our elders get lonely, and of course a dog or cat can be your best friend and provide some much-needed companionship. When you are retired and your children and grandchildren are no longer directly depending on you, you can be hard-pressed to find a sense of purpose. Caring for a pet can provide this life-affirming feeling. In addition, some types of pets can provide protection, even if it is simply by barking to alert its owner of unusual sounds coming from outside the residence.

To provide for your pet after your passing you must first identify a suitable caretaker. You may simply want to ask a family member or friend that you would consider to be a likely candidate. You then must make financial arrangements, and this can be done by simply leaving a bequest to the caretaker in your will. Another option would be to create a pet trust that will finance the care of your pet throughout its life.

To find out more about pet planning and pet trusts, simply arrange for an initial consultation with an experienced estate planning attorney.

Anderson, Dorn & Rader, Ltd is a member of the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys.

Probate Lawyers Understand The Process

Mar 21, 2011  /  By: Bryce L. Rader, Estate Planning Attorney  /  Category: Wills and Trusts

There are many “tools” to choose from when establishing your estate plan. One traditional option is the Will. If you research information about Wills you will find Internet marketing sites that will sell you a “one-size-fits-all” template. To hear them tell it, drawing up a Will is a simple matter but there’s more to it than meets the eye.

If you pass away leaving a Will as your estate plan your estate will pass through a probate procedure. The probate court will examine your Will to ensure its validity and proper execution.  During this process interested parties will have an opportunity to contest your Will. In this case the Court would schedule a hearing to review the matter. Obviously, when you’re planning your estate you don’t want your will to be contested; you want your wishes to be carried out to the letter.

Each state has different laws surrounding the formalities of drafting and executing a Will and the process of probate. If you were to use some sort of general template as a Will there is no telling whether or not it will wind up being ironclad once it is probated in the State Court.  Reno probate lawyers make a career out of working with the probate courts in northern Nevada, and we understand exactly how to construct documents that are specifically targeted for the local Court. Providing for your loved ones after you pass away is a serious matter that requires a an experienced estate planning attorney.

Anderson, Dorn & Rader, Ltd is a member of the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys.

Bill Makes Estate Tax Exclusion Portable

Feb 16, 2011  /  By: Bradley B. Anderson, Estate Planning Attorney  /  Category: Advanced Planning, Estate Planning, Taxes, Wills and Trusts

There were some big changes to the estate tax parameters included as part of the new legislation signed into law by the president on December 17th that is being called the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010.

The lead story from an estate planning perspective involved the rate of the tax and exclusion amount. Rather than the $1 million exclusion that was scheduled upon the expiration of the Bush tax cuts the exclusion is set at $5 million, and the rate of the tax is now 35% rather than the 55% that was on tap.

Is worthwhile to underscore the fact that this $5 million estate tax exclusion is for each individual. So if you are married you and your spouse have a total combined estate tax exclusion of $10 million to work with going forward in 2011 and 2012. If you think this through, a logical question will arise: If I passed away would my spouse get to use my $5 million exclusion as well as his or her own?

In estate planning circles this idea is defined as the issue of “portability.” To many observers the estate tax in and of itself is unfair, so as you might expect most of the rules surrounding it tend to defy logic as well. Until the passage of this new tax relief legislation in December the answer to the above question was no, your surviving spouse could not use your estate tax exclusion if you were to pass away.

The reason why this is unfair is because the estate that is accumulated by a married couple is the product of the earnings and investments of each individual; this wealth represents the combined efforts of two people. When one of these two people passes away his or her contribution to the estate still exists and it is taxable, but his or her exclusion is not available to defray the tax liability.

As a result of the new law the estate tax exclusion is now portable, and your spouse can indeed use your $5 million exclusion if either of you were to pass away. Unfortunately, the new measure is only available for the next 22 months and dies with the sunset provision in 2013. Who knows what the law will look like at that time, but at least there is now a “toe in the door.”

Anderson, Dorn & Rader, Ltd is a member of the American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys.